|
|
|
ACOUSTIC
RHINOMETRY REFERENCES
1)
Hilberg 0, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF . Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic
reflection.
J Appl Physiol. 1989 Jan; 66(1): 295-303
2)
Grymer LF, Hilberg 0, Elbrond 0, Pedersen OF.
Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity with septal
deviations, before and after septoplasty.
Laryngoscope. 1989 Nov; 99(11): 1180-7
3)
Hilberg 0, Grymer LF, Pedersen OF, Elbrond 0. Turbinate hypertrophy. Evaluation of the nasal cavity by acoustic
rhinometry .
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Mar; 116(3): 283-9
4)
Lenders H, Pirsig W.
How can hyperreactive rhinopathy be modified surgically? II: Acoustic
rhinometry and anterior turbinoplasty.
Laryngorhinootologie. 1990 Jun; 69(6): 291-7
5)
Elbrond 0, Hilberg 0, Felding JU, Blegvad-Andersen 0.
Acoustic rhinometry , used as a method to demonstrate changes in the
volume of the nasopharynx after adenoidectomy.
Clin Otolaryngol. 1991 Feb; 16(1): 84-6
6)
Illum P, Grymer L, Hilberg 0. Nasal packing after septoplasty.
Clin Otolaryngol. 1992 Apr; 17(2): 158-62
7)
Kase Y, ltimura K, Iinuma T .
An evaluation of nasal patency with acoustic rhinometry , preop. and
postop. compansons.
Nipon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993 Feb; 96(2): 197-202
8)
Grymer LF, Illum P, Hilberg 0.
Septoplasty and compensatory inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a randomized
study evaluated by acoustic rhinometry .
J Laryngol Otol. 1993 May; 107(5): 413 7
9)
Lildholdt T . Surgical versus medical treatment of nasal polyps.
Rhinol Suppl. 1989; 8: 31-3
10)
Elbrond 0, Felding JU, Gustavsen KM.
Acoustic rhinometry used as a method to monitor the effect of
intramuscular injection of steroid in the treatment of nasal polyps.
J Laryngol Otol. 1991 Mar; 105(3): 178-80
11)
Fouke JM, Jackson AC.
Acoustic rhinometry: effects of decongestants and posture on nasal
patency.
J Lab Clin Med. 1992 Apr; 119(4): 371-6
12)
Weeke J, Christensen SE, Orskov H, Kaal A, Pedersen MM, Il1um P, Harris
AG.
A randomized comparison of intranasal and
injectable octreotide administration in patients with acromegaly.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992 Jul; 75(1): 163-9
13)
Yamagiwa M, Hilberg 0, Pedersen OF, Lundqvist GR.
Evaluation of the effect of locaIized skin cooling on nasal airway volume
by acoustic rhinometry.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Apr; 141(4 Pt 1): 1050-4
14)
Fisher EW, Scadding GK, Lund VJ .
The role of acoustic rhinometry in studying the nasal cycle.
Rhinology. 1993 Jun; 31(2): 57-61
15)
Kase Y, Tanaka T, Iinuma T . The effect of unilateral nasal patency on the contralateral side.
Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993 Jul; 96(7): 1073-8
16)
O'Flynn P .
Posture and nasal geometry .
Acta Otolaryngol Stockh. 1993 Jul; 113(4): 530-2
17)
Lundqvist GR, Hilberg 0, Pedersen OF, Nielsen B. Nasal reactions to changes in whole body temperature.
Acta Otolaryngol Stockh. 1993 Dec; 113(6): 783-788
18)
Kase Y, Hilberg 0, Pedersen OF. Posture and nasal patency: Evaluation by acoustic rhinometry .
Acta Otolaryngol Stockh. 1994 Jan; 114(1): 70 74
19)
Rasp G .
Acoustic rhinometry: measuring the early and late phase of allergic
immediate reaction in allergic rhinitis.
Laryngorhinootologie. 1993 Mar; 72(3): 125-30
20)
Lenders H, Pirsig W.
Diagnostic value of acoustic rhinometry: patients with allergic and
vasomotor
rhinitis compared with normal controls.
Rhinology. 1990 Mar; 28(1): 5-16
21)
Grymer LF, Hilberg 0, Pedersen OF, Rasmussen TR.
Acoustic rhinometry: values from adults with subjective normal nasal
patency.
Rhinology. 1991 Mar; 29(1): 35-47
22)
Rieche1mann H, Rheinheimer MC, Wolfensberger M.
Acoustic rhinometry in pre-school children.
Clin Otolaryngol. 1993; 18: 272-277
23)
Lenders H, Pirsig W. Acoustic rhinometry: a diagnostic tool for patients with chronic
rhonchopathies.
Rhino1 Supp1. 1992; 14: 101-5
24)
Lenders H, Schaefer J, Pirsig W.
Turbinate hypertrophy in habitual snorers and patients with obstructive
sleep apnea: findings of acoustic rhinometry .
Laryngoscope. 1991 Jun; 101(6 Pt 1): 614-8
25)
Lundqvist GR, Yamagiwa M, Pedersen OF, Nielsen GD. Inhalation of diethylamine-acute nasal effects and subjective response.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992 Mar; 53(3): 181-5
26)
Kase Y, Itimura K, Iinuma T .
Acoustic rhinometry as a method for evaluating paranasal sinuses
experimental studies.
Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 1993 Feb; 96(4): 626-36
27)
Mayhew TM, O'Flynn P .
Validation of acoustic rhinometry by using the Cavalieri principle to
estimate nasal cavity volume in cadavers.
Clin Otolaryngol. 1993 Jun; 18(3): 220-5
28)
Hilberg 0, Jensen FT, Pedersen OF.
Nasal airway geometry; comparison between acoustic reflections and
magnetic resonance scannmg .
J Appl Physiol. 1993; 75(6): 2811-2819
29)
Edward W. Fisher, Adrian B. Boreham
Improving the reproducibility of acoustic rhinometry: a customised stand
giving control of height and angle.
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology June 1995, Vol. 109 pp 536-537
30)
Tomkinson A, Eccles R. Acoustic rhinometry: do we need a standardized operating procedure?
Clin Otolaryngol. 1996: 21 000-000
31)
Pedersen OF, Yamagiwa M, Miyahara Y, Sakakura Y Nasal cavity dimensions in guinea pigs measured by acoustic reflections.
American Journal of Rhinology 1994; 8:299-307
32)
Pedersen OF, Berkowitz R, Yamagiwa M, Hilberg O Nasal cavity dimensions in the newborn measured by acoustic reflections.
Laryngoscope, August 1994; Vol. 104 No.8 33)
Tomkinson, A. and Eccles, R. (1996) Comparison of the relative abilities
of acoustic rhinometry , rhinomanometry , and the visual analogue scale in
detecting changes in the nasal cavity in a healthy adult population.
American Journal of Rhinology 10: 161-165.
34)
G.K. Scadding, Y.C. Darby, C.E. Austin
Acoustic rhinometry compared with anterior rhinomanometry in the
assessment of the response to allergen challenge.
Clin. Otolaryngol. 1993: 19,000-000
35)
Zavras, et al.
Acoustic rhinometry in the evaluation of children with nasal or oral
respiration.
J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent 18:203-210, 1994
36)
Hillberg 0, Pedersen O.F .
Acoustic rhinometry: recommendations for technical specifications and
standard operating procedures.
Rhinology Supplement 16,3-17, 2000
37)
Ganslmayer M, Spertini F, Rahm F, Terrien M H, Mosimann B, Leimgruber A.
Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with
allergen.
Allergy 1999, 54, 974-979
38)
Porter M.J., Williamson I.G, Kerridge D. H, Maw A.R.
A comparison of the sensitivity of manometric rhinometry , acoustic
rhinometry, rhinomanometry and nasal peak flow to detect the decongestant effect
of xylometazoline.
Clin. Otolaryngol. 1995, 20, 000-000
39)
Andrew C. Jackson, Dan E. Olson
Comparison of direct and acoustical area measurements in physical
models of human central airways.
J. Appl.Physiol. 48(5): 896-902, 1980
40)
Hamilton JW, McRae RD, Phillips DE, Jones AS
The accuracy of acoustic rhinometry using a pulse train signal.
Clin. Otolaryngol. 1995 Jun:
20(3): 279-82
42. Acoustic Rhinometry: Values from adults with subjective norm31 nasel patency. Luisa F Grymer Ole Hilb,3rg Ole F Pedersen Torben R Rasmussen. Rhinology Vol. 29 35 47 1991.
43. Consensus report on Acoustic Rhinometry and Rhinomanometry. P.A.R. Clement and F. Gordts Standardisation Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway, I.R.S. and E.R.S. Rhinology, 43, 169-179, 2005
|